Skip to main content

State v. McDonald

Citations

  • 138 Wash. 2d 680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing accomplice liability under Washington law and concluding that there is no proximate causation requirement
  • analyzing accomplice liability under Washington law and concluding that there is no proximate causation requirement
  • rejecting alternative means analysis spares jury potentially impossible task of deciding which of two gunmen actually ldlled victim
  • noting, “we have made clear the emptiness of any distinction between principal and accomplice liability”
  • noting, \we have made clear the emptiness of any distinction between principal and accomplice liability\
  • \Under Rule 2.5(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure ... appellate courts will generally not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.