Washington Supreme Court· 8/5/1999
State v. McDonald
Citations
- 981 P.2d 443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing accomplice liability under Washington law and concluding that there is no proximate causation requirement
- analyzing accomplice liability under Washington law and concluding that there is no proximate causation requirement
- rejecting alternative means analysis spares jury potentially impossible task of deciding which of two gunmen actually ldlled victim
- noting, “we have made clear the emptiness of any distinction between principal and accomplice liability”
- analyzing accom- plice liability under Washington law and concluding that there is no proxi- mate causation requirement
- we review the trial court's decision on the reliability of a statement against penal interest for an abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 341×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 271×
- People v. SamuelsColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-10-15· cited 194×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-01-17· cited 186×
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 186×
- State v. SteinWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-12· cited 156×
- State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-04-11· cited 144×
- State v. IshWashington Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 131×
- State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 120×
- State v. RodriguezWashington Supreme Court· 2002-05-02· cited 108×
- State v. BassettWashington Supreme Court· 2018-10-18· cited 103×
- State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 77×
- In re the Detention of DuncanWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-22· cited 70×
- In Re MBCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 69×
- In Re Personal Restraint of DuncanWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-22· cited 69×
- In re the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 67×
- City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 55×
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-24· cited 52×
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 50×
- State Of Washington v. Arturo Cayetano-jaimesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-09-21· cited 40×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 813×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 629×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 556×
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-13· cited 542×
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-05· cited 245×
- State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-31· cited 243×
- State v. Ortega-MartinezWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 224×
- State v. StuddWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-01· cited 211×
- State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-30· cited 187×
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 186×
- State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court· 1974-08-15· cited 182×
- State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 165×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.