State v. McCorkle
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2604
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by ordering forfeiture of cash found in appellant's home. The finding that the cash was proceeds of drug trafficking was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's right to a speedy trial was not violated the speedy-trial time was reasonably tolled. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- speedy trial time tolled under R.C. 2945.72(D
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MizeOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-09· cited 22×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-21· cited 17×
- State v. AbstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-21· cited 9×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-06· cited 8×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-15· cited 7×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-21· cited 4×
- State v. B.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-08· cited 1×
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-11
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 247×
- Chapman Ents., Inc. v. McClain (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-07-15· cited 16×
- Dayton Police Department v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-09-24· cited 12×
- State v. GatewoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-20· cited 8×
- State v. IhrabiOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-31· cited 6×
- State v. BatdorfOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.