Skip to main content

State v. McCool

Citations

  • 53 Wash. 486
  • 102 P. 422
  • 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1351

Syllabus

<p>Bate — Evidence—Corroboration oe Prosecutrix — Connecting Defendant. In a prosecution for rape, proof that the parties were together under suspicious circumstances at another time two months previous to the time charged, is not such corroborating evidence aa tends to convict the defendant of the offense charged, within Laws 1907, p. 396, where the prosecutrix denied that any improper relations were had at that time.</p> <p>Same. In a prosecution for rape, proof that the prosecuting witness became pregnant, is not such corroborating evidence as tends to convict the accused of the crime, within Laws 1907, p. 396.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.