State v. Jonas
Citations
- 48 Wash. 133
- 92 P. 899
- 1907 Wash. LEXIS 873
Syllabus
<p>Rape — -Evidence—Cobbobobation—Sufficiency. There is sufficient corroborative evidence, within Laws 1907, p. 896, requiring a prosecutrix for rape to be corroborated by evidence which “tends to convict the defendant of the commission of the offense,” where, in addition to evidence of similar acts during several years, circumstances and conditions showing opportunity at the time in question, and testimony of a physician establishing the fact of intercourse for a considerable period, it appeared that the defendant advised his wife to induce the prosecuting witness to leave the state, and his admissions showed that he had often taken liberties with the person of the prosecutrix.</p>
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1911-12-19· cited 56×
- State v. StewartWashington Supreme Court· 1909-03-03· cited 14×
- State v. SefritWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-12· cited 10×
- State v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court· 1911-07-13· cited 7×
- State v. McCoolWashington Supreme Court· 1909-06-11· cited 6×
- State v. HessWashington Supreme Court· 1915-07-13· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court· 1884-05-26· cited 61×
- State v. FetterlyWashington Supreme Court· 1903-12-29· cited 49×
- State v. RollerWashington Supreme Court· 1903-01-12· cited 20×
- State v. WoodWashington Supreme Court· 1903-12-02· cited 17×
- Frank Waterhouse, Ltd. v. Rock Island Alaska Min. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1899-10-19· cited 11×
- State v. ForsytheSupreme Court of Iowa· 1896-10-08· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.