State v. Raymond
Citations
- 69 Wash. 98
- 124 P. 495
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 852
Syllabus
<p>Rape—Evidence—Corroboration—Necessity. Under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2443, providing that no conviction of rape shall be had upon the testimony of the female against whom the crime was committed unless supported by other evidence, corroboration of her testimony as to the use of force to overcome her resistance is essential where force is an element of the offense under -Id., § 2435.</p> <p>Rape—Evidence—Sufficiency. There is no corroboration of the prosecuting witness as to the use of force to overcome her resistance, where there were no eyewitnesses, no one heard her outcry, if she made any, she made no complaint for some time, her clothing was not torn and she was not injured, it not being sufficient to merely prove opportunity and recent penetration.</p>
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1911-12-19· cited 56×
- The People v. . PlathNew York Court of Appeals· 1885-12-08· cited 55×
- State v. StewartWashington Supreme Court· 1909-03-03· cited 14×
- State v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court· 1911-07-13· cited 7×
- State v. McCoolWashington Supreme Court· 1909-06-11· cited 6×
- State v. AtonWashington Supreme Court· 1912-03-18· cited 3×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 1912-01-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.