Skip to main content

State v. McCarthy

Citations

  • 2003 ME 40
  • 819 A.2d 335
  • 2003 Me. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that suppression of a defendant’s statements is not an appropriate remedy for the government’s violation of the no-contact rule
  • concluding that suppression of a defendant's statements is not an appropriate remedy for the government's violation of the no-contact rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saufley, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Alexander, Calkins, Levy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.