Skip to main content
· 5/21/1997

Matter of Howes

Citations

  • 940 P.2d 159
  • 123 N.M. 311
  • 1997 NMSC 024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting In re Doe, 801 F. Supp 478 and Ferrara, 847 F. Supp. 964
  • ”[M]any courts have recognized that the public would be ill-served if the misconduct of an individual attorney permitted an otherwise guilty person to go free.”
  • publicly censuring the assistant United States Attorney who violated the rule prohibiting contact with a represented party without the party's attorney being present
  • publicly censuring the assistant United States Attorney who violated the rule prohibiting contact with a represented party without the party's attorney being present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKINNON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.