Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/5/2003
State v. Mayorga
Citations
- 62 P.3d 818
- 186 Or. App. 175
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that forged resident alien and Social Security cards qualified as “other document [s]” that “evidence” a “legal right, interest, obligation, or status” under former ORS 165.013(l)(d) (2001), renumbered as ORS 165.013(l)(a)(D) (2005)
- “Caution is warranted when applying the rule, both because of its uncertain justification and because of its malleability.”
- in construing a statute, ejusdem generis maxim does not apply “when its application would lead to redundancy or to a construction that otherwise is at odds with the legislature’s apparent intentions”
- statute should be interpreted, when possible, to give effect to all provisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-28· cited 38×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 14×
- Waggoner v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 6×
- State v. AzarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-06· cited 3×
- Blachana, LLC v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 1×
- State v. Gonzalez-AguillarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
- Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court· 1988-09-29· cited 89×
- Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-06· cited 85×
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 66×
- State v. ChakerianOregon Supreme Court· 1997-06-12· cited 50×
- Bolt v. Influence, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 33×
- Sanders v. Oregon Pacific States InsuranceOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-29· cited 31×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KirkmanOregon Supreme Court· 1992-05-01· cited 9×
- People v. PenaNew York Supreme Court· 1996-04-15· cited 9×
- Britton v. Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-08-24· cited 7×
- Sanders v. Oregon Pacific States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 5×
- Environmental Quality Commission v. City of Coos BayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-22· cited 5×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 5×
- People v. SelimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-05-31· cited 2×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-08-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.