Skip to main content
· 8/23/2017

State v. Gonzalez-Aguillar

Citations

  • 287 Or. App. 410
  • 403 P.3d 539
  • 2017 WL 3611601
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]n direct appeals, all filings must be read ‘in a liberal manner’ whether or not the veteran is represented”
  • holding that before VA can adjudicate an original claim for benefits, “the claimant must submit a written document identifying the benefit and expressing some intent to seek it”
  • holding that before VA can adjudicate original claim for benefits, \the claimant must submit a written document identifying the benefit and expressing some intent to seek it\
  • holding that before VA can adjudicate a claim for benefits, \the claimant must submit a written document identifying the benefit and expressing some intent to seek it\
  • holding that before VA can adjudicate original claim for benefits, “the claimant must submit a written document identifying the benefit and expressing some intent to seek it”
  • holding that before VA can adjudicate 6 original claim for benefits, \the claimant must submit a written document identifying the benefit and expressing some intent to seek it\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Garrett, Lagesen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.