Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Insurance Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff failed to preserve a contention advanced for the first time in its reply brief on appeal
• observing that “the phrase ‘such as’ is indicative of a nonexclusive list of examples” (emphasis in original)
• discussing application of preservation principles where proponent of position did not raise issue in trial court, although opponent discussed it in its response
• declining to review alternative theory for reversal advanced for the first time in reply brief
• refusing to consider new argument for error that was raised in reply brief because it “simply comes too late”
• in context of insurance policy exclusion, \The ordinary meaning of the words 'arising out of' is very broad.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).