Skip to main content

State v. Mathis

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4887

Syllabus

Motion to suppress consent sufficiency tampering with evidence. There was competent, credible evidence to support the trial court's finding that the defendant voluntarily consented to the search of her cell phone, and the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress on that basis. The defendant's conviction for tampering with evidence was supported by sufficient evidence.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.