State v. Massey
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 100
Syllabus
State appeals decision granting motion to suppress. State argued court's decision failed to consider certain facts necessary to analyze the motion to suppress. However, facts highlighted were merely characterizations of the evidence. Court thoroughly discussed the facts relevant to its decision. Decision granting suppression affirmed where the evidence supported findings that the officer had no lawful reason to stop the defendant, no reasonable articulable suspicion necessary to extend the stop, and the defendant's consent to search was not voluntarily obtained.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 94×
- State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 26×
- State v. TrivettOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-19· cited 15×
- State v. BullockOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-13· cited 14×
- State v. CumminsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-22· cited 10×
- State v. SextonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-24· cited 7×
- State v. FiskOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.