State v. Fisk
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2989
Syllabus
Defendant appeals denial of motion to suppress evidence. Defendant on bicycle detained for traffic infraction. Methamphetamine recovered by police after pat-down search. Officer could detain the defendant for purposes of issuing traffic citation. Defendant gave voluntary consent to conduct the pat-down search and officer was not required to have reasonable suspicion that the defendant was armed and dangerous.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- State v. PoseyOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 168×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2003-08-06· cited 128×
- State v. Akron Airport Post No. 8975Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 103×
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 94×
- State v. ChildressOhio Supreme Court· 1983-05-04· cited 35×
- State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 26×
- State v. BullockOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-13· cited 14×
- State v. CumminsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-22· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.