Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/4/2022
State v. Martre
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 639
Syllabus
Judgment denying return of property affirmed where prior appeal determined a lawful seizure and appellant failed to include the transcript of hearing to review whether competent, credible evidence presented to demonstrate the cell phone and memory card were contraband, subject to disposition under R.C. 2981.12 and 2981.13.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-05-24· cited 4,737×
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court· 2008-12-09· cited 73×
- State ex rel. Martre v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-06· cited 37×
- Crane v. Perry County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court· 2005-12-28· cited 16×
- State v. HollowayOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-28· cited 9×
- State v. MorenoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-10· cited 8×
- Carr Development Group, LLC v. Town of North WebsterIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-02· cited 5×
- Breaston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-08-27· cited 5×
- State v. Van TielenOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-27· cited 2×
- Sullinger v. SullingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-30· cited 2×
- Cleveland v. TarulliOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-30· cited 2×
- State v. MartreOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.