State v. Moreno
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 479
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in denying the motion of defendant's ex-wife for the return of property seized by law enforcement pursuant to a search warrant. The trial court properly held a hearing, pursuant to R.C. 2981.03(A)(4), to determine whether the property was unlawfully seized and whether ex-wife was entitled to its return. Trial court reasonably concluded that the property was lawfully seized pursuant to the warrant and was evidence to be used by the State in defendant's prosecution. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Miami County· 2018-06-29· cited 16×
- State v. IhrabiOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-31· cited 6×
- State v. LeetOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-16· cited 6×
- State v. MartreOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-04· cited 4×
- State v. GlennOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-21· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.