Court of Appeals of Kansas· 11/21/2014

State v. Martinez

Citations

50 Kan. App. 2d 1244
338 P.3d 1236
2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that \[a]rguments of counsel are not evidence and do not establish the facts of the case\ (internal quotation and alteration omitted)
recognizing that \[a]rguments of counsel are not evidence and do not establish the facts of the case\ (internal quotation and alteration omitted)
recognizing that \[arguments of counsel are not evidence and do not establish the facts of the case\ (internal quotation and alteration omitted)
recognizing that \[a]rguments of counsel are not evidence and do not establish the facts of the case\ (internal quotation and alteration omitted)
stating that the party who raises 8 an affirmative defense bears the burden of proving its applicability
noting that the party asserting an affirmative defense bears the burden of proving each element of that defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruns, Pierron, Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.