Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/31/2013

State v. Baker

Citations

297 Kan. 482
301 P.3d 706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

following Ross, 295 Kan. 1126, and finding district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing consecutive sentences
affirming on direct appeal the district court's imposition of consecutive sentences in this case
upholding court's sentence even though defendant expressed remorse and accepted responsibility
defendant bore burden of proving abuse of discretion in district court's order that sentences would run consecutively, rather than concurrently
defendant bore burden of proving abuse of discretion in district court's order that sentences would run consecutively, rather than concurrently
defendant bore burden of proving abuse of discretion in district court's order that sentences would run consecutively, rather than concurrently

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.