Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/4/2004

State v. Martinez

Citations

100 P.3d 30
209 Ariz. 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “Blakely error is subject to harmless error or fundamental error analysis and may or may not require reversal based on the facts of a particular case”
holding that \ Blakely error is subject to harmless error or fundamental error analysis and may or may not require reversal based on the facts of a particular case\
noting the court may weigh additional aggravating and mitigating circumstances to determine the appropriate sentence within the available range
“Further, we hold that Blakely error is subject to harmless error or fundamental error analysis and may or may not require reversal based on the facts of a particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Portley, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.