State v. Martin Edmo Ish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it insufficient to establish defendant’s identity to prior alleged crime without correlating evidence of defendant’s birthdate, social security number, or other identifying data
• remanding for resentencing because appellate court was “not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the persistent violator finding did not affect the sentence imposed by the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).