State v. Medrain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a certified copy of a judgment of conviction bearing the same name as the defendant, with nothing more, is insufficient to establish the identity of the person formerly convicted beyond a reasonable doubt
• holding, where the sentencing judge stated on the record that the persistent violator enhancement was a “nonissue” at sentencing given the defendant’s numerous other felonies, we could say beyond a reasonable doubt the erroneous persistent violator finding did not affect the sentence imposed
• holding, where the sentencing judge stated on the record that the persistent violator enhancement was a “non-issue” at sentencing given the defendant’s numerous other felonies, we could say beyond a reasonable doubt the erroneous persistent violator finding did not affect the sentence imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).