State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he extension of the unexpired statute of limitations did not alter an element of the crime, ‘did not change the ultimate facts needed to prove guilt, nor did it punish a previously innocent act.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mordja v. Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court
  Montana Supreme Court· 2008-01-30· cited 7×
• Thomas v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-04-12· cited 6×
• El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Candelario Ayala
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2003-11-08· cited 6×
• El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. José O. Candelario Ayala
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2005-11-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stogner v. California
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 356×
• State v. Lyles
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2003-09-16· cited 49×
• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-05-24· cited 29×
• State v. Hamel
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-03-31· cited 21×
• Minton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-29· cited 15×
• In re Hamel
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-07-30· cited 12×
• People v. Superior Court (German)
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-03-17· cited 6×