Washington Supreme Court· 1/7/1999
State v. Martin
Citations
- 137 Wash. 2d 149
- 969 P.2d 450
- 1999 Wash. LEXIS 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \shall\ imposes a mandatory requirement unless a contrary legislative intent is apparent
- “shall” imposes a mandatory requirement unless a contrary legislative intent is apparent
- \shall\ and \may\ in same statute
- discussing different meanings of “may” and “shall”
- “shall” and “may” in same statute
- “shall” and “may” in same statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Madsen, Sanders, Talmadge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-27· cited 50×
- State v. A.M.R.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-08-08· cited 36×
- State v. MarkingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-21· cited 31×
- State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-18· cited 12×
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-08-19· cited 10×
- State v. R.G.P.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-06-11· cited 8×
- State v. CowinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-11· cited 6×
- State v. CowinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-29· cited 3×
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1999-01-07
- State v. AMRWashington Supreme Court· 2002-08-08
- AgoWashington Attorney General Reports· 2001-09-10
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court· 1993-12-13· cited 1,133×
- United States v. Montalvo-MurilloSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 232×
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court· 1985-12-12· cited 220×
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1886-04-26· cited 211×
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 159×
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 155×
- State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-20· cited 139×
- Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1993-05-20· cited 110×
- Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court· 1982-02-25· cited 107×
- United States v. David MeyersTenth Circuit· 1996-11-05· cited 105×
- Soundgarden v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court· 1994-04-14· cited 73×
- State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court· 1980-10-09· cited 70×
- State v. BartholomewWashington Supreme Court· 1985-12-12· cited 59×
- State v. MollichiWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-08· cited 56×
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-20· cited 32×
- State v. ReganWashington Supreme Court· 1969-07-03· cited 27×
- Demaris v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court· 1903-10-27· cited 21×
- State v. Eugene W.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-09-12· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.