State of Arizona v. David James Yonkman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not error to admit acquitted-act evidence against a defendant in a subsequent trial so long as the evidence met evidentiary requirements under Arizona law
• victims testifying about each other’s statements harmless error because statements consistent and both victims subject to cross-examination
• Alleged errors were harmless because the witnesses were subject to cross-examination and any error did not affect the verdicts.
• preclusion of evidence defendant had been acquitted of similar prior offenses harmless error because defendant admitted to police he had touched victim, thereby corroborating victim’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).