Supreme Court of Iowa· 8/29/1975

State v. Droste

Citations

232 N.W.2d 483
1975 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

upholding State recall of a patrolman “to establish a proper foundation for testimony relating to the breath test analysis”
stating a party cannot amplify or add new grounds as a basis for relief in a motion for new trial, which must stand or fall on exceptions taken at trial
cumulative effect of trial errors resulted in denial of fair trial
“The grounds of a motion for new trial must stand or fall on exceptions taken at trial and a party cannot in a post- verdict motion amplify or add new grounds as a basis for relief.”
“When a standard . . . has been fixed by law, no witness . . . is permitted to express an opinion as to whether or not the person or the conduct, in question, measures up to that standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Mason, Rawlings, Legrand, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.