Skip to main content

State v. Marshall

Citations

  • 199 N.E.3d 665
  • 2022 Ohio 3795

Syllabus

On appeal of trial court judgment convicting defendant of trafficking in persons, compelling prostitution, promoting prostitution, and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity. Defendant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. There are no errors regarding jurisdiction or venue, the testimony of a challenged witness is admissible and proper, and the court's jury instructions are not prejudicial to the defendant. Defendant's five assignments of error are overruled and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Beatty Blunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.