Skip to main content

State v. Rohrig

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3903

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed. The arresting officer and city prosecutor did not lack authority to prosecute the appellant for violating a protective order under R.C. 2919.27 and the municipal court did not lack jurisdiction to hear the case. Because the appellant failed to order a transcript of the trial court proceedings as required by App.R. 9(B)(3), the regularity of the trial court's evidentiary rulings is presumed.

Judges: Mentel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.