State v. Rohrig
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3903
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed. The arresting officer and city prosecutor did not lack authority to prosecute the appellant for violating a protective order under R.C. 2919.27 and the municipal court did not lack jurisdiction to hear the case. Because the appellant failed to order a transcript of the trial court proceedings as required by App.R. 9(B)(3), the regularity of the trial court's evidentiary rulings is presumed.
Judges: Mentel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.