State v. Marrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that presence of multiple officers outside home did not contribute to coercive environment that would invalidate defendant's voluntary consent because \there was no evidence that defendant was aware of their presence....\
• explaining that “[a]n exigent circumstance is found to exist in the presence of an emergency or dangerous situation” (cleaned up)
• “A ‘knock and talk’ is a procedure by which police officers approach a residence and knock on the door to question the -7- STATE V. REAVES Opinion of the Court occupant, often in an attempt to gain consent to search when no probable cause exists to obtain a warrant.” (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stanley
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-05-15· cited 6×
• State v. Kirkman
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-12-20· cited 2×
• State v. Burris
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-03-21
• State v. Piland
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-16
• State v. Piland
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-12-18
• State v. Carpenter
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-05-02
• State v. Falls
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-12-15
• State v. Corrothers
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-08-06
• State v. Reel
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-12-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Mendenhall
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
• Florida v. Bostick
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
• Florida v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
• Kentucky v. King
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-16· cited 1,457×
• United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. Solis
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-05-19· cited 206×