New Mexico Court of Appeals· 11/20/1997
State v. Marquez
Citations
- 951 P.2d 1070
- 124 N.M. 409
- 1998 NMCA 010
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that 17 the trial court’s refusal to admit cumulative testimony is not an abuse of discretion
- not error to allow 12-year-old victim of sexual assault to hold teddy bear while testifying when court “properly balanced” her need against possibility of prejudice
- trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting twelve-year-old sexual assault victim to testify while holding a teddy bear because “[t]he trial court properly balanced the prejudicial effect of the teddy bear against the necessity of the teddy bear’s calming effect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flores, Alarid, Apodaca
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DyeWashington Supreme Court· 2013-09-26· cited 170×
- State v. MyersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-04-07· cited 54×
- State v. UriosteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-12-07· cited 46×
- State v. DombosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-01-16· cited 46×
- State v. AponteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-27· cited 44×
- State v. RosalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-06-03· cited 43×
- State v. StevensNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2014-04-07· cited 43×
- People v. TohomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-07-10· cited 41×
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-08-18· cited 34×
- Norwest Bank New Mexico, N.A. v. Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-04-09· cited 33×
- State v. MercerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-12-29· cited 25×
- State v. UriosteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-10-25· cited 24×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-07-31· cited 18×
- State v. BentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-12-04· cited 18×
- State v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-27· cited 14×
- State v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-08-10· cited 12×
- Colonias Development Council v. Rhino Environmental Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-12-02· cited 10×
- In re Garrison P.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-07-16· cited 3×
- State v. FergusonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2022-10-27· cited 3×
- State v. BentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-08-26
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-11-08· cited 160×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 89×
- State v. WorleyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-13· cited 58×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-30· cited 46×
- State v. FairweatherNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-28· cited 45×
- People v. GutkaissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-07-14· cited 38×
- Sexton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-04-26· cited 35×
- State of Arizona v. GevrezArizona Supreme Court· 1944-05-12· cited 28×
- State v. PalabayHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1992-12-17· cited 25×
- State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-03-14· cited 23×
- State v. CliffIdaho Court of Appeals· 1989-09-27· cited 20×
- State v. RossNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-24· cited 20×
- State v. BENNY E.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-04-26· cited 18×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-08-19· cited 18×
- People v. KabonicCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-02-10· cited 9×
- Windell Lane Sexton v. E. Dale Howard James H. Evans, Attorney General of the State of Alabama Beth Slate Poe, Assistant Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 1995-06-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.