State v. Palabay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting “compelling necessity” standard, requiring the prosecution to show that the item is necessary to facilitate the witness’s testimony
• requiring prosecution to show that special measure is necessary to facilitate witness’s - 23 - J-S12043-20 testimony, adopting “compelling necessity” standard
• requiring prosecution to show that special measure is necessary to facilitate witness’s - 23 - J-S12043-20 testimony, adopting “compelling necessity” standard
• prior consistent statement not admissible where “Complainaint’s credibility was never attacked by any of the [three] means set forth in HRE 613(e)”
• credibility of witness must be “attacked by one of three means: (1) a prior inconsistent statement; (2) a charge that the witness’s testimony was recently fabricated or influenced by bias or improper motive; or (3
• an attempt to persuade jury through deceptive argument is considered to be prosecutorial misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).