Skip to main content

State v. Madigan

Citations

  • 199 Vt. 211
  • 2015 Vt. 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting “the ‘fresh-complaint rule’ as an independent evidentiary doctrine because the doctrine has been largely supplanted by rules of evidence” but noting that that 14 State v. Martinez (Simon Ortiz), No. 97496-9 (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.