Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/23/2000
State v. Maddox
Citations
- 997 P.2d 276
- 165 Or. App. 573
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- treating as legal error trial court’s failure to exercise discretion where it determined that it lacked authority to grant the defendant’s waiver
- a court may not affirm a lower tribunal’s ruling on grounds different from those on which it relied “if the parties were not allowed to develop the factual record at trial to address the issue raised for the first time on appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Durham v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 23×
- State v. BruningCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-20· cited 3×
- Williams v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-08· cited 2×
- State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-18· cited 1×
- State v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-07-12
- State v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-22
- State v. FechterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-02
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 119×
- Stelts v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court· 1985-06-18· cited 40×
- State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 24×
- State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court· 1999-04-01· cited 23×
- State v. YsasagaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-01-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.