Durham v. City of Portland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming on alternative ground of issue preclusion, even though issue preclusion had not been raised at trial
• affirming on alternative ground of issue preclusion, even though issue preclusion had not been raised at trial
• listing factors to be considered in determining if issue preclusion applies
• listing factors to be considered in determining if issue preclusion applies
• under ORS 30.285, a tort claim against a public employee for acts that occurred within the scope of employment must be brought solely against the public body
• at the third step of the McDonnell Douglas analysis, a federal court “reaches the question with which Oregon courts begin: [w]hether, on the record as a whole, the evidence permits a reasonable inference that the plaintiff was the victim of intentional discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).