Skip to main content

State v. Macias

Citations

  • 282 Or. App. 473
  • 386 P.3d 186
  • 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the trial court did not plainly err in failing to intervene in defendant’s cross-examination of the witness and strike the testi- mony sua sponte”
  • concluding that the trial court did not err in failing to strike testimony sua sponte because it was plausible that the defendant made a decision to not object to it when the \defendant objected to a number of other statements by witnesses as impermissible comments on credibility\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.