State v. Wickstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a state ban on falsely acting as a police officer
• upholding a state ban on falsely acting as a police officer
• no prejudice in allowing State to amend complaint to charge an additional count based on same allegations supported by original complaint
• an amendment increasing the maximum penalty was not prejudicial when the defendant had adequate notice and the ability to defend
• “Notice to the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusations is the key factor in determining whether an amended charging document has prejudiced a defendant.”
• defendant's sentence not invalid because trial court had commented upon defendant's beliefs during sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).