Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 7/24/1990
State v. Lynch
Citations
- 796 P.2d 1150
- 61 O.B.A.J. 2102
- 1990 OK 82
- 1990 Okla. LEXIS 88
- 1990 WL 103246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s “constitutional responsibilities” and “inherent power” compelled the con- elusion that the practice of compulsory appointment of attorneys without providing adequate compensation amounted to an unconstitutional taking of private property
- applauding pro bono legal representation, court nevertheless holds that \voluntary services are insufficient to accommodate the right of indigent citizens to the effective assistance of counsel\
- \most even handed approach in setting fees is to tie the hourly rate of the counsel appointed for the indigent defendant to the hourly rate of the prosecutor/district attorney and the public defenders\
- involuntarily appointed counsel entitled to reasonable overhead and out-of-pocket expenses plus an hourly rate \tied to the salary range paid to assistant district attorneys and the district attorneys\ within the state, depending \on the attorney's qualifications\
- “Although we invite legislative attention to this problem, in the interim, we must establish guides which will apply uniformly without either violating due process rights or granting constitutional immunites.”
- “Although we invite legislative attention to this problem, in the interim, we must establish guides which will apply uniformly without either violating due process rights or granting constitutional immunites.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kauger, Hargrave, Hodges, Lavender, Wilson, Summers, Opala, Simms, Doolin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harris v. ChampionTenth Circuit· 1994-01-26· cited 315×
- Ronald Keith Williamson v. Ronald Ward, Warden, State Penitentiary at McAlesterTenth Circuit· 1997-04-10· cited 173×
- State v. PeartSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-07-06· cited 140×
- Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa· 2010-11-24· cited 96×
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2015-06-30· cited 94×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-02-15· cited 90×
- Ramos Acevedo v. Tribunal Superior, Sala de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1993-06-14· cited 79×
- State Ex Rel. MacY v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1991-06-25· cited 65×
- Johnson v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1991-10-29· cited 58×
- Recorder's Court Bar Ass'n v. Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court· 1993-08-03· cited 52×
- Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2018-06-26· cited 51×
- State v. CitizenSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2005-04-01· cited 49×
- Lavallee v. Justices in the Hampden Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-07-28· cited 33×
- Gaines v. MaynardSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1991-03-19· cited 32×
- State v. WigleySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-09-09· cited 30×
- Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1997-02-18· cited 28×
- Pruett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-27· cited 24×
- COMPSOURCE MUTUAL INSUR. CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. TAX COMM. and OKLA. ASSOC. OF ELECTRIC SELF INSURERS FUND v. STATE OF OKLA. TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2018-06-26· cited 20×
- Eastern Oklahoma Building & Construction Trades Council v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2003-12-16· cited 19×
- In re SilvermanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-25· cited 15×
Cites
92 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court· 1981-12-14· cited 4,924×
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 4,814×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,039×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 2,614×
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1954-05-17· cited 2,385×
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 2,030×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,818×
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 1,173×
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,096×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 1,047×
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 976×
- Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 904×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.