Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/19/1995

State v. Lynch

Citations

900 P.2d 1042
135 Or. App. 528
1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the defendant had not preserved argument that officers’ initial warrantless entry into his house, in response to neighbor’s report of burglary in progress, was not justified by exigent circumstances
where probable cause existed that a burglary was in progress, exigent circumstances justified entry and search into areas that could conceal a burglar
where probable cause existed that a burglary was in progress, exigent circumstances justified entry and search into areas that could conceal a burglar
where probable cause existed that a burglary was in progress, exigent circumstances justified entry and search into areas that could conceal a burglar
on appeal, “[w]e are bound by the trial court’s findings of historical fact and review to determine whether the trial court applied the correct law to those facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riggs, Landau, Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.