Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/26/2002
State v. Burnett
Citations
- 60 P.3d 547
- 185 Or. App. 409
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1981
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing the denial of a motion in arrest of judgment for legal error
- indictment error not cured by properjury instruction because court could not say “with certainty that the grand jury based the indictment on facts that satisfy” the elements of the crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Brewer, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-15· cited 16×
- State v. AntoineCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-11· cited 10×
- State v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 8×
- State v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-21· cited 7×
- State v. EberhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-14· cited 5×
- State v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-07-08· cited 2×
- State v. AlbondanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 1×
- State v. PerelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-26
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-24· cited 78×
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court· 1994-11-25· cited 41×
- State v. RussellOregon Supreme Court· 1962-06-27· cited 32×
- State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-15· cited 14×
- State v. PaetehrCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-07-12· cited 5×
- State v. BeamanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-09-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.