Skip to main content

State v. Lowe

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 851

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling Appellant's motion to suppress. The information in the search warrant was not stale. Nor did the affidavit supporting the warrant contain material misrepresentations or omit material information. Also, when Appellant was questioned, he was not in custody for Miranda purposes. Nor was Appellant intentionally misled into making involuntary statements. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.