State v. Losh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the revocation of appellant’s probation where “the district court found [her] continued use and involvement with controlled substances [to be] a danger to the public interest”
• deferring to district court's credibility determinations in probation-revocation proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Losh
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-28· cited 30×
• State v. Beaty
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-05-24· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Griffith v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
• State v. Austin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 156×
• State v. Pieschke
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 133×
• State v. Hannuksela
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-03-16· cited 131×
• O'MEARA v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-05-13· cited 55×
• State v. Fields
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-12-18· cited 24×
• State v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-01-30· cited 21×
• State v. Hockensmith
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-01-15· cited 14×
• State v. Spanyard
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-11-20· cited 8×
• State v. Moot
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-23· cited 6×
• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-07-16· cited 2×