Skip to main content

State v. Lewis

Citations

  • 656 N.W.2d 535
  • 2003 Minn. LEXIS 19
  • 2003 WL 194167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We review de novo the question whether and to what extent our precedent should be given retroactive effect.\
  • ‘We agree ... that the district court should be free to consider the effect that changes in the sentence have on the entire plea agreement.” (emphasis added)
  • “We agree . . . that the district court should be free to consider the effect that changes in the sentence have on the entire plea agreement.” (emphasis added)
  • “[W]here the district court finds no compelling or substantial circumstances supporting an upward departure in the sentence that was agreed upon in a plea agreement, it may consider motions to vacate the conviction and the plea agreement.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson, Anderson, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.