Skip to main content
· 11/20/1984

State v. Spanyard

Citations

  • 358 N.W.2d 125
  • 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “[district] court did not believe [the probationer’s] explanations for failing to return . . . property” and deferring to that determination “[g]iven that the function of the factfinder is to weigh the credibility of witnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Popovich, Sedgwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.