Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/12/1995
State v. Lopez
Citations
- 235 Conn. 487
- 668 A.2d 360
- 1995 Conn. LEXIS 422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Mathews factors in concluding no per se right to evidentiary hearing on state's motion to rectify transcript
- applying Mathews factors in concluding no per se right to evidentiary hearing on state’s motion to rectify transcript
- applying Mathews test and concluding that trial court's order rectifying transcript without evidentiary hearing did not violate criminal defendant's federal constitutional right to procedural due process
- applying Mathews test and concluding that trial court’s order rectifying transcript without evidentiary hearing did not violate criminal defendant’s federal constitutional right to procedural due process
- trial court, has discretion to determine whether to hold evidentiary hearing before correcting transcript
- rectification to correct court reporter’s purportedly inaccurate tran- scription of trial court’s instruction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-08· cited 162×
- In re Samantha C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-27· cited 96×
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 75×
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-03· cited 74×
- State v. HickamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-26· cited 70×
- State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-18· cited 50×
- Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-11-26· cited 37×
- Pinchbeck v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-21· cited 29×
- Khan v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-06-27· cited 19×
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-05-07· cited 16×
- GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. GlennConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-14· cited 11×
- In re Jason M.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-01-30· cited 10×
- State v. Samuel U.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-11-28· cited 4×
- Presnick v. DelaneyD. Connecticut· 1999-10-13· cited 3×
- Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-03-27· cited 2×
- Knight v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-03-12· cited 2×
- In re Yasiel R.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-08-18
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-11-24
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 2,975×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,078×
- Coleman v. Conservation Society of Southern Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 208×
- Roundhouse Construction Corporation v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-04-22· cited 99×
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 78×
- Roundhouse Construction Corp. v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-01-27· cited 74×
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-09-04· cited 74×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-07-01· cited 70×
- State v. CubanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-04-07· cited 52×
- Roundhouse Construction Corp. v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 47×
- Douglas v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-21· cited 10×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-01-26· cited 2×
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-11-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.