New Mexico Supreme Court· 9/13/1983
State v. Lopez
Citations
- 669 P.2d 1086
- 100 N.M. 291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that where the defendant believed the substance he was attempting to sell was cocaine, he was guilty of attempting to traffic in a controlled substance, even though it was factually impossible to commit the crime because the substance was, in fact, not cocaine
- “[Wjhen a defendant does everything that is required to commit a crime but is frustrated due to the fact that completion is impossible, he can nevertheless be found guilty of attempt.”
- defendant guilty of attempt to sell cocaine, even though sub stance was not cocaine, because situation is no different from a case “in which a defendant shoots into the intended victim’s bed believing the victim to be there, when in fact the victim is elsewhere”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riordan, Hendley, Payne, Stowers, Sosa, Federici, Lopez, Bivins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-04-11· cited 52×
- State v. BankertNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-05-02· cited 47×
- State v. GreenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-09-21· cited 32×
- Cummings v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-08-28· cited 20×
- State v. VillalobosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-08-23· cited 14×
- State v. CurryNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-03-31· cited 10×
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-12-20· cited 7×
- State v. CurtissIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-11-07· cited 6×
- State v. VillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-12-02· cited 5×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. CoplonSecond Circuit· 1950-12-05· cited 253×
- United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1976-01-12· cited 146×
- United States v. CoplonSupreme Court· 1952-01-28· cited 101×
- People v. JaffeNew York Court of Appeals· 1906-04-15· cited 88×
- People v. . MoranNew York Court of Appeals· 1890-10-07· cited 86×
- United States v. Everett, GeorgeThird Circuit· 1983-02-15· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. TibbettsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1893-01-03· cited 69×
- Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-09-22· cited 46×
- United States v. Peter Harold KornFifth Circuit· 1977-08-15· cited 45×
- United States v. Abel v. QuijadaNinth Circuit· 1979-01-04· cited 43×
- United States v. Heng Awkak RomanS.D. New York· 1973-03-19· cited 36×
- United States v. Heng Awkak Roman, A/K/A Roman and Lee Koo, A/K/A Lee, A/K/A Lanky LeeSecond Circuit· 1973-09-26· cited 32×
- State v. TrejoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-02-04· cited 29×
- Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1964-12-23· cited 29×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri· 1902-12-16· cited 28×
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-11-21· cited 26×
- People v. RollingNew York Supreme Court· 1962-11-05· cited 26×
- State v. GuffeyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1953-11-06· cited 25×
- Clark v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1888-04-26· cited 16×
- The People v. HuffIllinois Supreme Court· 1930-04-17· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.