Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/11/2001
Chen v. State
Citations
- 42 S.W.3d 926
- 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 26
- 2001 WL 356256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that based on evidence the defendant was communicating with an undercover officer posing as a child over the internet, the doctrine of legal impossibility did not apply when completing the crime “was apparently possible” from the standpoint of the defendant
- stating that if the officer had been a 13-year-old girl, what the defendant intended to accomplish would have been an actual crime
- stating that if the officer had been a 13-year-old girl, what the defendant intended to accomplish would have been an actual crime
- stating that if the officer had been a 13-year-old girl, what the defendant intended to accomplish would have been an actual crime
- stating that if the officer had been a 13-year-old girl, what the defendant intended to accomplish would have been an actual crime
- stating that if the officer had been a 13-year-old girl, what the defendant intended to accomplish would have been an actual crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thornton, GregoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-04-02· cited 270×
- Herrin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-12-18· cited 167×
- Bien v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-06-06· cited 51×
- State v. StoneTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-04-01· cited 39×
- Dornbusch v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-03-24· cited 34×
- State v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-06-29· cited 17×
- Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-06-06· cited 11×
- Gibbs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-31· cited 3×
- State v. Gary Wayne StoneTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-04-01
- Nickolas Eric Kosick v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2007-08-31
- Lamar Elmer Smith, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-03-16
- Phillip Ashcraft v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-07-31
- Bruce Earl Godlock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-08-20
- Joe Alan Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-06-06
- Elias A. Martinez v. Fidelis C. Abigide and Willie BrooksTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-08-14
- Michael Edward Kilpatrick v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-12-06
- John Perry Dornbusch v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-01-27
- Mark A. Clark v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-02-19
- Timothy Herring v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-01-16
- in the Interest of A.L.D.H., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2012-04-10
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-19· cited 221×
- Lawhorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-04-05· cited 60×
- Van Bell v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 30×
- Yalch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-20· cited 25×
- People v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-07-11· cited 24×
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-09-13· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.