State v. Lohr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court erred in concluding defendant’s purse was a household item and therefore subject to search
• court erred in concluding defendant's purse was a household item and therefore subject to search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kipp
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-02-06· cited 40×
• State v. Z.U.E.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-01-07· cited 22×
• State v. Light
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-05-23· cited 7×
• State Of Washington v. Shelly Arndt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-09-25· cited 5×
• State v. Light
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-05-23· cited 1×
• State Of Washington v. Z.E.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-01-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• State v. Thomas
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
• State v. Hill
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 742×
• State v. Garvin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-05-28· cited 276×
• State v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 147×
• State v. Wethered
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 138×
• State v. Afana
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 126×
• State v. Worth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-26· cited 15×