State v. Lively

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “ ‘in legal drafting, redun- dancy is a fairly common phenomenon’ ” (quoting Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County, 229 Or App 188, 195, 211 P3d 297 (2009))
• analyzing the meaning of \remove\ under ORS 164.813 by applying Gaines and PGE

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-06· cited 3×
• Allied Structural v. CCB
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-05

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Stamper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-09· cited 105×
• State v. Wimber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-24· cited 78×
• State v. Stamper
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-23· cited 61×
• Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-09-18· cited 41×
• Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-24· cited 20×
• State v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-05-26· cited 12×
• State v. Alben
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 10×
• State v. Jacobs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-10· cited 5×
• State v. Leachman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-01· cited 2×
• City of Beaverton v. Pack
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-16· cited 1×