State v. Litzau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A stipulation as to evidence to be considered at trial is clearly permissible and is binding upon the trial and appellate courts.”
• conviction reversed although results of polygraph test were admitted based on parties' stipulation
• conviction reversed although results of polygraph test were admitted based on parties’ stipulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Torkelson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-21· cited 6×
• State v. Winter
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-09-02· cited 5×
• State v. Schaeffer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-05-11· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Valdez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1962-05-23· cited 193×
• People v. Barbara
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 166×
• State v. Marti
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-03-19· cited 134×
• State v. Frazier
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1979-02-06· cited 118×
• State v. Dean
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-07-06· cited 89×
• State v. Goblirsch
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-07-23· cited 38×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-08· cited 35×
• Akonom v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-12-06· cited 33×
• People v. Monigan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-05-21· cited 31×
• Tynan v. KSTP, INC.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-04-27· cited 30×
• Robinson v. Wilson
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-12-27· cited 26×
• State v. Jahnke
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-31· cited 21×
• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-08· cited 19×
• State v. Michaeloff
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-15· cited 12×
• Abendroth v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-02-26· cited 6×