State v. Winter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court plainly erred by not redacting references to polygraph test from recording and transcript of police interview
• holding it was error to admit defendant’s interview with police without redacting references to polygraph testing
• “Rulings on evidentiary matters rest within the sound discretion of the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dressel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-05-19· cited 4×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-12-24· cited 2×
• State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Nowacki
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-05-23

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Griller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 451×
• State v. Strommen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-08· cited 147×
• State v. Riley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-31· cited 58×
• State v. Quick
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-10· cited 44×
• State v. Fenney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 40×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-01-12· cited 18×
• State v. Schaeffer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-06-15· cited 15×
• State v. Lindsey
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-12-27· cited 9×
• State v. Litzau
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-11-19· cited 5×