State v. Little

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding enhancement of adult criminal history score due to juvenile delinquency adjudications
• use of juvenile adjudications in computing criminal history score is not inconsistent with the purpose of the Minnesota Juvenile Court Act; Act itself permits use of juvenile adjudications to determine a proper sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. LaMunyon
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-01-26· cited 34×
• State v. McFee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-21· cited 22×
• In Re the Welfare of C.D.N.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-02-11· cited 15×
• State v. Morrow
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-11-17· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• In Re GAULT
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
• McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
• People v. West
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-04-03· cited 44×
• Pickens v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-08-20· cited 15×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-08· cited 1×